This Laguna Beach listing is an interesting commentary - the seller believes that a house that was "totally rebuilt" at the peak of the market should command the same price as was spent then, sans post-bubble pricing adjustment.
23 Emerald Bay, 92651
Asking price: $4,800,000
| Beds: | 3 |
| Baths: | 2.75 |
| Sq. Ft.: | 2,711 |
| $/Sq. Ft.: | $1,771 |
| Lot Size: | 6,200 Sq. Ft. |
| Property Type: | Residential, Single Family |
| Style: | Two Level, Mediterranean |
| View: | Coastline, Ocean, Panoramic, Park/ |
| Year Built: | 2006 |
| Community: | North Laguna |
| County: | Orange |
| MLS#: | L30699 |
| Source: | CARETS |
| Status: | Active |
| On Redfin: | 77 days |
Leave it to Emerald Bay to kick the housing bubble. There is some serious wealth in this area, but we're not sure how you would make the argument that this property is obviously worth $4.8 million while this one should be $4.5 million. At these kind of dollar amounts, it's really all about personal preference. You can expect that all the houses at this price to be nice and have nice views.Assuming the property can be sold for the current asking price, it would mean the property has appreciated 422% in about a decade considering that it went for $920,000 in 1998. That's a rate of about 38% per year every year - pretty nice! Of course, the question is raised that if the house had not been totally rebuilt, it would not likely be worth the same amount today. So, if the sellers can find someone to pay their price, we would reason that they're coming out a winner.


1 comments:
My goodness - is this the kind of description one gets for a $5 million dollar home?
Post a Comment